Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.
KMID : 1038120200530050568
Clinical Endoscopy
2020 Volume.53 No. 5 p.568 ~ p.574
Comparison of Oral Sulfate Solution and Polyethylene Glycol Plus Ascorbic Acid on the Efficacy of Bowel Preparation
Nam Ji-Hyung

Hong Seok-Bo
Lim Yun-Jeong
Lee Seong-Ju
Kang Hyoun-Woo
Kim Jae-Hak
Lee Jin-Ho
Abstract
Background/Aims: The quality of bowel preparation is one of the quality indicators for colonoscopy. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of oral sulfate solution (OSS) and polyethylene glycol plus ascorbic acid (PEG-AA) for bowel preparation.

Methods: The study involved 167 patients who underwent diagnostic colonoscopies. Inadequate bowel preparation was defined as any score of ¡Â1 in each colon section based on the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale. Multivariate logistic regression was used to compare the efficacy of OSS and PEG-AA. Subgroup analyses were performed based on patient characteristics.

Results: Overall, 106 (63.5%) patients received OSS, and 61 (36.5%) patients received PEG-AA. The rate of inadequate bowel preparation was 12.3% in patients receiving OSS and 32.8% in patients receiving PEG-AA (p=0.001). OSS (odds ratio [OR] = 0.26; p=0.003) and morning examination (OR=0.11; p=0.038) were significantly associated with efficient bowel preparation. The efficacy of OSS compared with PEG-AA was only significant in patients ¡Ã50 years of age vs. <50 years of age (OR=0.13; p=0.001 vs. OR=0.96; p=0.959) and female vs. male patients (OR=0.06; p=0.002 vs. OR=0.58; p=0.339).

Conclusions: OSS was significantly more efficient for bowel preparation than PEG-AA, especially in patients ¡Ã50 years of age and female patients. Morning examination led to a good quality of bowel preparation, irrespective of the preparation regimen.
KEYWORD
Bowel preparation, Colonoscopy, Oral sulfate solution, Polyethylene glycol
FullTexts / Linksout information
Listed journal information
ÇмúÁøÈïÀç´Ü(KCI) KoreaMed ´ëÇÑÀÇÇÐȸ ȸ¿ø